Election denier Tina Peters will get clemency after admitting she ‘made a mistake,’ Colorado’s Democratic governor says
Colorado Governor Grants Clemency to Election Denier Tina Peters After She Admits to ‘Mistake’
Election denier Tina Peters will get clemency – Colorado’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis, has announced that former election clerk Tina Peters will receive clemency, leading to her release from prison. Polis revealed this decision exclusively to CNN, stating that Peters’ sentence will be halved to 4.5 years. He added that this reduction could allow her to be paroled within a month, depending on the time she has already served and the state’s early-release guidelines. Peters, who was incarcerated for her role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, admitted to making an error in her clemency application, a statement obtained by CNN from Polis’ office.
Admission of Error Sparks Clemency Decision
In a previously unreleased statement, Peters acknowledged for the first time since her 2024 conviction that she “made a mistake” and “misled” Colorado election officials. The admission came as part of her clemency petition, which Polis’ office shared with CNN. This confession marks a shift from her earlier stance, where she had consistently denied wrongdoing and argued that her actions were aligned with federal requirements to preserve election records. The governor’s office emphasized that Peters’ acknowledgment was a critical factor in the decision to reduce her sentence.
“I made a mistake four years ago,” Peters stated in the document. “I misled the secretary of state when allowing a person to gain access to county voting equipment. That was wrong. Going forward, I will make sure that my actions always follow the law.”
Peters’ conviction stemmed from her alleged involvement in a conspiracy to breach Mesa County’s election systems, aiming to support President Donald Trump’s claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election. A jury in the conservative-leaning Mesa County found her guilty of these charges in 2024. The case has been a focal point of Trump’s ongoing efforts to challenge election results, with the former president consistently demanding her release.
Trump’s Persistent Pressure on Colorado
Polis noted that Trump has maintained a sustained campaign to pressure Colorado over Peters’ incarceration. This includes both public statements and private discussions, according to the governor. While Trump often highlights Peters’ political alignment, Polis pointed out that the president frequently misrepresents facts about her crime, her actions, and his ability to pardon her for state-level offenses. “He gets her age wrong. He gets what she did wrong,” Polis said, underscoring his belief that the clemency decision reflects a commitment to fairness over political influence.
“Polis said he agrees with a recent appeals court ruling which found that the trial judge improperly punished Peters for her protected speech about the 2020 election,” CNN reported. “But he knows, especially among Democrats in his state and beyond, that’s going to be tough.”
The appeals court’s decision last month upheld Peters’ criminal convictions but directed the trial judge to reconsider her sentence. The court determined that part of her punishment was based on her speech about the election, which violates her First Amendment rights. Polis acknowledged that the ruling highlights the tension between holding officials accountable and protecting their freedom of expression. “I hope that Democrats don’t sacrifice our deeply held belief in free speech because of political expediency or disregard for what people are saying,” he added.
Despite the clemency, the governor stressed that Peters’ actions were still criminal. “She committed a crime, and I was personally disgusted with what she said about the 2020 election,” Polis said. “But we have to make sure our justice system is blind and fair.” This sentiment reflects the broader debate over whether Peters’ speech should be considered a criminal offense, particularly in the context of election integrity.
Unfounded Claims and Ongoing Influence
Peters has continued to advocate for election conspiracies while serving her sentence. Her official website still labels her as a victim of “politically motivated” prosecutions, claiming the charges were designed to “silence” her for exposing what she believes are critical flaws in the election system. Meanwhile, her social media accounts regularly share claims from supposed informants, including allegations that American voting machines use Venezuelan technology to flip votes. These posts have drawn attention from Trump’s supporters, who have called for her immediate release.
“He gets what she did wrong. My focus was doing what’s right and then looking at the merits of the case,” Polis said, addressing the public misinformation surrounding Peters’ case.
Witnesses at Peters’ trial testified that in 2021, she provided unauthorized access to election offices in Mesa County to individuals linked to Mike Lindell, a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist. These individuals copied sensitive election data to audit the 2020 results, a move Peters claimed was necessary to uphold election standards. However, her team has since denied these allegations, arguing that her actions were in line with federal law.
The clemency announcement comes as Colorado’s legal system grapples with the balance between accountability and free speech. While Peters’ admission of error has softened public criticism, her continued promotion of unfounded claims has kept her in the spotlight. Polis acknowledged this, stating that the governor has seen the posts and Peters’ arguments but believes they are not sufficient grounds to keep her incarcerated. “That’s not a reason to keep her behind bars,” he said, emphasizing his commitment to a fair process.
Possible Early Release and Future Implications
Even without clemency, Peters could be eligible for a halfway house or similar arrangement as early as this November if she demonstrates good behavior. This possibility has sparked discussions about her release timeline, with some arguing that her prison term is too long given her recent admission. Meanwhile, her legal team has been actively seeking public support, highlighting the political weight of her case.
The clemency decision signals a potential turning point in the state’s approach to election-related convictions. With Peters being the last Trump ally still serving time for 2020 election crimes, her release could influence how other officials facing similar charges are treated. Polis’ office maintains that the decision was based on Peters’ willingness to acknowledge her mistake, but critics argue it could set a precedent for leniency toward those who challenge election results.
As the state prepares for a new sentencing hearing, the focus remains on whether Peters’ actions warrant criminal punishment or if her rhetoric should be considered a mitigating factor. Her case underscores the ongoing political and legal battle over the integrity of the 2020 election, with supporters and detractors alike using it to advance their agendas. For now, the clemency marks a step toward her eventual release, but the debate over her role in the election conspiracy is far from over.
