Fate unknown of many returned to DPR Korea from China: UN independent experts

image560x340cropped-80

Fate Unknown of Many Returned to DPRK from China, UN Experts Say

Provpnmatrix.com – The fate unknown of many returned to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) from China remains a serious concern, according to independent UN human rights experts. Three years after reports that large-scale forced repatriations resumed, there is still little reliable information about the location, safety or treatment of many people sent back.

The experts warned that the lack of independent monitoring in China and the DPRK, also known as North Korea, leaves many returnees unaccounted for. People who remain in China may also face the risk of forcible return despite fears of persecution, detention or other abuses.

“These events form part of a longstanding pattern of serious human rights violations against individuals forcibly returned to the DPRK. In the absence of independent monitoring in either country, many returnees remain unaccounted for.”

Risks after forced return

Without access to credible information, it is difficult to determine whether people returned to the DPRK are safe, detained, transferred to prison facilities or punished for leaving the country. UN experts said the fate unknown of many returned can expose families to prolonged uncertainty while limiting efforts to secure protection or accountability.

Returnees may face enforced disappearance, arbitrary detention, torture, forced labour, sexual and gender-based violence, execution and other serious violations. The risks can be particularly severe for people viewed as having left the country without authorization or sought asylum abroad.

Kim Cheol-ok’s case

The experts highlighted the case of Kim Cheol-ok, who is believed to have escaped the DPRK during the famine of the 1990s. She was reportedly trafficked into China as a child, forced to marry at age 14 and subjected to sexual violence and forced pregnancy.

Kim reportedly lived in China for about 25 years and developed family ties there, but her irregular immigration status left her vulnerable to harassment and restrictions. Chinese authorities detained her in April 2023 without access to legal representation and forcibly returned her to the DPRK in October that year. Her whereabouts and condition have not been made public.

In 2024, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that Kim’s detention in China and the DPRK was arbitrary. Her experience illustrates the compounded dangers facing women who leave North Korea, including trafficking, coercive marriage, sexual exploitation and the threat of repatriation.

Non-refoulement obligations

The UN experts stressed that irregular migration status does not remove a person’s right to protection. The principle of non-refoulement prohibits returning someone to a place where they face a real risk of persecution, torture, or cruel and inhuman treatment.

“Irregular migration status does not diminish the obligation to respect the principle of non-refoulement.”

China was urged to stop returning DPRK nationals, uphold non-refoulement and provide fair procedures for assessing international protection needs. The experts also called on authorities in Pyongyang to disclose the fate and whereabouts of those returned.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the fate unknown of many returned to the DPRK?

Independent monitoring and access to information are limited in both China and the DPRK. As a result, families, advocates and UN experts may be unable to confirm where returnees are held or whether they are safe.

What protection should DPRK nationals receive in China?

People facing return should have access to fair, effective procedures that assess their individual protection needs. This includes the opportunity to explain fears related to persecution, trafficking, family separation or other harm.

Why are forced returns a human rights concern?

Evidence cited by UN experts indicates that people returned to the DPRK may face severe punishment. The fate unknown of many returned therefore remains a pressing concern for relatives and for those still at risk of repatriation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *